Instead, we should use the nouns which represent the entity that the endpoint that we’re retrieving or manipulating as the pathname.This is because our HTTP request method already has the verb.

Consider this example:The former is more intuitive (from the REST perspective) and much more common — the latter is more SOAPy. Is that 400 Bad Request (eg, Hey, we don’t have a Legal department so we can’t even begin to look for employees that match your request) or 404 Not Found (eg, Well, we checked the list of departments but didn’t find Legal in it).

Below given points may serve as a checklist for designing the security mechanism for REST APIs. See There will be times where this doesn’t have a lot of flexibility — for example, if the DTO needs access to a service that is injected into the controller, then ModelState.IsValid won’t work because the DTO doesn’t know about the service ahead of time. I would have avoided shooting my own leg a couple of times if I would have known the things listed in this one.hey Macaroni King! Securing your API against the attacks outlined above should be based on: Authentication – Determining the identity of an end user.

Having verbs in our API endpoint paths isn’t useful and it makes it unnecessarily long since it doesn’t convey any new information. It reduces the cognitive load for users of the API.Subject oriented article! I believe the one thing that is not debatable and is definitely just plain wrong, and very bad practice, is associating any of your design of your REST API with your underlying database. A common situation would be one in which a RESTful server constructs business objects by consulting several A better “best practice” here would be to say “Consider payload size / network congestion, and what features will make your service most useful to the client.”There is absolutely no relationship between following RESTful principles and formatting the messages as JSON.

Leave it at that, and encode any domain-specific information in the body of the response itself – there’s absolutely no practical, compelling reason to encode domain details as cryptic HTTP status codes, requiring you to read a manual and handle all sorts of ambiguous status codes with a new meaning for every type of resource.This nonsense caught on because it looks cool and feels good, not because it has any practical merit or value.90% of the time, just encode your information as JSON.

These might seem a bit strange or overwhelming when served at once, but try making your own REST API. Always Use HTTPS boilerplate,

Change is inevitable!

You want to be able to change your database design without having to redesign your API. The only rule is that you must state what the content is in the content-type header field.Firstly, I think this confuses the issue of “throwing” exceptions and returning status codes that indicate an error in the API request.When a server formats and returns a non-2xx status code to the consumer it’s Secondly, it’s difficult to have a “best practice” in the area of returning non-success HTTP codes since the specification around this is not great and usage is not consistent.

I think he nails it.I agree. Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Spring is one of the most popular Java frameworks. However, the data that users get may be outdated. Gross.I like to keep things simple. Here are a few simple rules to follow.Document your API well.

Because the job of a controller is not to know how to process a certain request — the controller should So what’s the difference?

Therefore, using SSL/TLS for security is a must.A SSL certificate isn’t too difficult to load onto a server and the cost is free or very low.

Otherwise, we create problems for clients that use our APIs, which isn’t pleasant and detracts people from using our API. I am using laravel 5.6 .