Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. Links to download Supporting Information files are also available after the reference list.To be eligible for publication manuscripts must meet our Unlike many journals which attempt to use the peer review process to determine whether or not an article reaches the level of 'importance' required by a given journal, Registered Reports are primary research articles in which the methods and proposed analyses are peer reviewed prior to conducting experiments, data collection or analysis.
Registered Report: primary research articles that describe the findings from a study preregistered as a Registered Report Protocol. Please know that your recommendation has been duly considered and your service is appreciated, even if the final decision does not accord with your review.If you have questions or concerns about the manuscript you are reviewing, or if you need assistance submitting the review, please email us PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, based in San Francisco, California, US This record will confirm that you completed a review for the journal, but won’t publish the content of your review.Answers to the questions in this section are required and will be included in the decision letter to the author. An image J plugin for the high throughput image analysis of in vitro scratch wound healing assays. This procedure is aimed at ensuring a thorough, transparent, and productive review process. Comments from experts who reviewed the article that would traditionally remain unseen helps contextualize the research. PLOS ONEeditors evaluate research on the basis of scientific validity, rigorous methodology, and high ethical standards, with the aim of making all well-conducted research freely available. We like science to be out in the open, and publication of peer-reviewed research to take place without undue delays, so that others can use and build upon the findings. ).I was contacted to perform a review for F 1000 and felt first honored but then felt a little hesitant in being “offensive”.Would I have done differently if I reviewed anonymously ? Last May, PLOS announced a new option for authors to publish their peer review history, and the support from our communities has been loud and clear. Learn More Submit Now About Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open.Opening access to the reviewer comments benefits readers who wish to dive deeper into a specific study. If you need more time to perform the review, please In choosing to volunteer as peer reviewer for PLOS, you are helping to support free and open access to rigorous research. Alternatively, an author may entice a reviewer to sign their name if their paper is already participating in other aspects of open science, such as publishing a preprint or sharing data and code in a repository.

PLOS ONE is a peer reviewed scientific journal with a rigorous editorial screening and assessment process made up of several stages. If we ask you to complete the review anyway, be sure to declare the competing interest when you submit your review.Co-reviewing is a great way to gain peer review experience under the mentorship of an experienced reviewer and we encourage this collaboration. You can find out more about how PLOS processes your data by reading our If you had help completing the review you must share your collaborator’s name with the journal when you submit the review, either by entering it in question 2 under the 'Confidential comments to Editor' section, or via Keep manuscripts and correspondence confidential and do not share information about submissions with any one else unless previously agreed with the editor. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open. PLOS ONE Papers of 2012 January 3, 2013 Krista Hoff Aggregators Article-Level Metrics As we start off the New Year, we wanted to take a quick moment and highlight a few noteworthy papers published in 2012. 07/28/2020. Upcoming researchers can get a glimpse behind the curtains and see what sort of requests authors in their field were asked to address during revisions. Reviewer invitations are sent by email from the journal's Editorial Manager submission system. Scientific discovery is a process of continuous vetting and refinement. Click the link at the top of each preview page to download a high-resolution version of each figure.